SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE IN THE INSTITUTIONAL “SECTION” OF ECONOMIC EVOLUTION

Authors

 

Zoidov K.Kh.Ph.D., Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Integration of the Russian Economy into the World Economy Institute of Market Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPR RAS), Moscow, Russia, kobiljonz@mail.ru

Urunov A.A.Doctor of Economics, Professor, State University of Management, Moscow, Russia, urunov@rambler.ru

 

Annotation

 

   The purpose of the article is to show, on the basis of subjective and objective factors and reasons, the advantages of the evolutionary-institutional approach to the analysis and regulation of the national economy. The implementation of the mechanisms for regulating spatial development presented in the article will allow concentrating the available resource potential on priority areas of the country’s socio-economic development and guaranteeing a stable pace of progressive cyclical macroeconomic dynamics. The advantage of the evolutionary-institutional approach to the analysis and regulation of the national economy is the possibility of studying transactions in a three-dimensional coordinate system: economic time, distance, configuration of the zone of influence. The mechanism of acquiring subjective processes into evolutionarily significant institutional formations presented in the work of one of the founders of modern institutional-evolutionary economic theory, Professor J. Hodgson (Great Britain) is analyzed in detail. The aspect of the “institutional cut” of the evolution of the transition economy studied by M. Deryabina is considered, according to which one of the most intractable problems in the transition economy is the presence of informal norms and rules developed in the planning and distribution system and reproduced in the “semi-market” economic environment in adapted forms. It is concluded that the advantage of the evolutionary-institutional approach to the analysis and regulation of the national economy is the possibility of studying transactions in a three-dimensional coordinate system: economic time, distance, configuration of the zone of influence.

 

Keywords

 

national economy, evolutionary-institutional approach, spatial development, institution

 

References

 

  1. Deryabina M. Institutional aspects of the post-socialist transition period // Questions of Economics. – 2001. – No. 2. — pp. 108-124.
  2. Zoidov K.Kh. Evolutionary approach and its significance for the development of the economic system in post-Soviet countries // Economics and Mathematical Methods. 2009. V. 45. No. 2. Р. 96-112.
  3. Zoidov K.Kh. Lessons of the transformational crisis //Economic science of modern Russia. – 2005. – No. 4. – S. 44-56.
  4. Zoidov K.Kh. Evolutionary-institutional approach and methodology of anti-crisis measures in the transitional economy // Economics and Mathematical Methods. 2004. V. 40. No. 3. Р. 16-32.
  5. Zoidov K.Kh. On the problem of creating a synthetic theory of overcoming the transformational crisis //Economic science of modern Russia. 2002. No. 2. Р. 37-50.
  6. Kleiner G.B. The evolution of institutional systems. — M.: Nauka, 2004
  7. Kleiner G.B. Russian Economy and the Crisis of Mutual Expectations // Social Sciences and Modernity. – 1999. – No. 2. – pp. 5-19. P.13.
  8. Lvov D.S. Institutional Economics, M., 2002.
  9. Polterovich V.M. Institutional Dynamics and Reform Theory. In: Evolutionary economics and the “mainstream”. — M.: Nauka, 2000. — Р. 31-55.
  10. Polterovich V.M. Crisis of economic theory // Economic science of modern Russia. – 1998. – No. 1. – Р. 46 – 66.
  11. Urunov A.A. Integration and economic growth. M.: Publishing House “Grail”, 2003. -424 p.
  12. Urunov A.A. Regional economy. Textbook and practice. M.: INFRA-M, 2020. -366р.
  13. Hodgson J. Habits, rules and economic behavior // Questions of Economics. – 2000. – No. 1.Friedman M. The Methodology of Positive Economics. — In.: Friedman M. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953. — 368 p. р. 22.

 

Publication date

2023-10-27