METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES IN THE REGION

The article discusses methodological approaches to assessing the innovative development of an enterprise, the implementation of which contributes to the expansion of economic opportunities, increased production efficiency and the strengthening of competitive positions. It shows the evolution of the essence of innovative development of an enterprise and methodological approaches to its assessment from single quantitative methods to multifaceted analysis. Based on the study and critical analysis of existing methodological approaches, a grouping of approaches with a similar methodological basis was carried out. Among the methodological approaches considered, the one that most fully reflects the picture of innovative development of industrial enterprises in the region is the integrated approach. When using this approach in the process of assessing innovative development, both quantitative and qualitative indicators of the activities of industrial enterprises are taken into account. An integral part of the integrated approach is the method of calculating the integral index of innovative development, which allows for a comprehensive assessment of the level of innovation of an enterprise using key areas such as the share of innovative products, the number of implemented technologies and patents, the level of investment in R&D, the degree of interaction with scientific organizations, human resources, etc. Using the method of the integral index of innovative development, an assessment of the innovative activity of one of the leading industrial enterprises of the region, Farovon LLC, was carried out. The assessment revealed a high level of innovative development based on the use of a systems approach in modernization and the creation of new production technologies.

innovative development, assessment of innovative development, methodological approaches, industrial enterprises of the region, systemic and comprehensive approach, quantitative and qualitative approach, indicative and factor approaches, cluster approach, integral index of innovative development.

1. Avezova M.M. Innovative model of sustainable development of the economy of Tajikistan: strategy, priorities, resources. Bulletin of PITTU named after academician M.S. Osimi. 2017. No. 3 (4). P. 83-96.

2. Avezova M.M., Urunov A.A., Usmanov D.I., Mansurova M.G., Model of formation of the trajectory of sustainable economic development of the region’s industry in the context of diversification. Economy, entrepreneurship and law. 2024, No. 5 (14). P. 1879-1892.

3. Bagiev G.L., Tarasevich V.M. Ann H.A. Innovation management. – St. Petersburg: Peter, 2007.

4. Bertalanffy L. General theory of systems. – M.: Progress, 1969.

5. Bobylev A.S., Voronova O.I. – A systems approach to managing innovations at enterprises. Moscow: Economy, 2018

6. Bukhova S., Doroshenko Yu. Assessment of economic efficiency of innovations of different types // economic analysis: theory and practice. 2005. No. 3.

7. Gusev V.V., Kozlov A.S. – An integrated approach to assessing the innovative development of enterprises. M.: Economy, 2020.

8. Efremov I. “Methods for assessing the effectiveness of innovations”, Business and Economics, 2019. – P. 102-104.

9. Ivanov P. S., Pavlov A. I. – Assessment of innovative development of enterprises using integral indices. Moscow: Nauka, 2018.

10. Kalashnikov V.D. “Assessment of innovation activity: quantitative methods”, Journal “Economics and Innovation”, 2018. — P. 34-35.

11. Kotler R.F. “Marketing Management”, 15th edition. – P. 15.

12. Larkin V.A. “Analysis of Patent Activity as an Indicator of Innovative Activity”, Journal of Innovation Research, 2020. – P. 58-60.

13. Mansurova M.G., Avezova M.M. Comparative terminological characteristics of innovation and diversification processes for sustainable development purposes. Bulletin of PITTU named after academician M.S. Osimi. 2024, No. 1 (30). P. 62-75.

14. Okildzhonova Sh.Yu., Avezova M.M. Development of a set of strategic measures for investment and innovation development of the Sughd region of Tajikistan. Bulletin of PITTU named after academician M.S. Osimi. 2024 No. 2 (31). P.77-92.

15. Pankova L. N., Uzdenov I. Sh. Assessing the results of innovative development of the region // Innovations in regional development: collection. mat-ov international. conf. – Moscow, 2012.- pp. 45–52.

16. Porter M. Competition. – M.: Williams, 2005.

17. Porshnev A.N. Innovative economics.- M:INFRA-M. 2011.

18. Sokolova N.P. “An indicative approach to the analysis of innovations at the enterprise”, Economic research, 2017. – P. 47-49.

19. Trifilova A.A. Management of innovative development of the enterprise / A.A. Trifilova. Moscow: Finance and Statistics, 2003. 176 p.

20. Shannon M.H. “Strategic Management: Theory and Practice”, Moscow, 2016. – P. 89.

21. Schmidt K.V. “Methodology for assessing innovation processes”, Bulletin of Innovative Technologies, 2015. – P. 28.

22. Solow R. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function // Review of Economics and Statistics. — 1957.

23. Tinbergen J. On the Theory of Economic Policy. — Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1952.

2026-03-30